Which board is preferable for IoT applications

Subscribe to the forum to receive notifications about new posts.
Post Reply
Mansi
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2024 11:57 am

Hello,

I would like to know which board is preferable for IoT applications: ODROID-C4 or Arduino MKR GSM 1400.
Has anyone used them in their applications?
How can I find resources to work with these boards for IoT applications?
I am not familiar with using these boards, so please guide me on a simple project or suggest the simplest IoT controller board to work with.
User avatar
Shraddha
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2024 3:54 pm

Hello Mansi,

When choosing between the ODROID-C4 and the Arduino MKR GSM 1400 for IoT applications, it's important to consider the specific needs of your project and the features of each board.

1. ODROID-C4
a) Processor: Quad-core ARM Cortex-A55.
b) RAM: 4GB.
c) Storage: MicroSD or eMMC module.
d) Connectivity: Ethernet, USB ports, GPIO pins, and various interfaces (I2C, SPI, UART).
e) Operating System: Can run full Linux distributions like Ubuntu.

2. Arduino MKR GSM 1400
a) Processor: SAMD21 Cortex-M0+ 32-bit ARM.
b) RAM: 32KB.
c) Storage: 256KB Flash.
d) Connectivity: GSM/3G for cellular connectivity, WiFi, USB, GPIO pins, and various interfaces (I2C, SPI, UART).
e) Operating System: Arduino sketch-based programming.

3. ODROID-C4 is more powerful with its quad-core processor and larger memory. It's suitable for projects that require more computing power and flexibility, such as running a small web server, processing data locally, or handling more complex tasks. It requires a more in-depth knowledge of Linux and software development.

4. Arduino MKR GSM 1400 is specifically designed for IoT applications with GSM/3G connectivity, making it ideal for projects that need remote monitoring and control without relying on WiFi. It’s easier to get started with if you are familiar with Arduino programming and require a simpler setup.

Resources for Working with These Boards

ODROID-C4 - https://wiki.odroid.com/odroid-c4/odroid-c4
Arduino MKR GSM 1400 - https://docs.arduino.cc/hardware/mkr-gsm-1400/

If you're looking for a very beginner-friendly IoT board, consider the Arduino MKR WiFi 1010. It has built-in WiFi and is part of the Arduino ecosystem, making it easy to find resources and support.

Arduino MKR WiFi 1010:
Processor: SAMD21 Cortex-M0+.
Connectivity: WiFi and Bluetooth.
Ease of Use: Simple programming via the Arduino IDE.
Product Link: https://robu.in/product/original-arduin ... 010-board/
Resource: https://docs.arduino.cc/hardware/mkr-wifi-1010/

This board is great for simple IoT projects such as home automation, environmental monitoring, and basic data logging.
Hope this helps you. *:)
Smit
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2024 2:13 pm

If you are going to ODROID-C4 , i would prefer to use Raspberry Pi 3B+ and Raspberry Pi 4/5 with 4/8 ram.And these board are quite powerful than odroid-c4 but they also requires better understanding to linux which i dont think a complex task , for IOT application you can install raspbian os and install node-red software which allows to intergrate sensors and other instruments connected through gpio pins and display data on a dashboard locally and on a ip address if internet is connected to rpi.
Raspberry pi Zero W is also a good option for lower level iot porjects which do not require that much of power and computing.
Mansi
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2024 11:57 am

Thank you for the guidance and suggestions.

When looking at the specifications, it's clear that the Raspberry Pi is better due to its cost-effectiveness and extreme flexibility. However, in many discussions, I've heard about the Odroid. If you are into development, or if you are planning for long-term use such as building servers, Odroid is a powerful option with good community support for Linux, even though it is a bit more expensive.

I am somewhat familiar with using the Raspberry Pi 4B. Considering that the Raspberry Pi Zero W has fewer features than the Raspberry Pi 4, I will definitely refer to the Raspberry Pi 4 for my application. However, I would like to know if it is suitable for large interfacing options as well. Also, could you confirm its lifecycle for me?
Post Reply